The Fitbit Plus API is a RESTful API. The requests and responses are formated according to the JSON API specification.
In addition to this documentation, we also provide an OpenAPI “yaml” file describing the API: Fitbit Plus API Specification.
Authentication for the Fitbit Plus API is based on the OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework. Fitbit Plus currently supports grant types of client_credentials and refresh_token.
See POST /oauth/token for details on the request and response formats.
We will provide customers with unique client credentials for each application/integration they build, allowing us to enforce appropriate access controls and monitor API usage. The client credentials will be scoped to the organization, and allow full access to all patients and related data within that organization.
These credentials are appropriate for creating an integration that does one of the following:
The API credentials and oauth flows we currently support are not well suited for creating a user-facing application that allows a user (patient, coach, or admin) to login and have access to data which is appropriate to that specific user. It is possible to build such an application, but it is not possible to use Fitbit Plus as a federated identity provider. You would need to have a separate means of verifying a user’s identity. We do not currently support the required password-based oauth flow to make this possible.
The Fitbit Plus API supports two different pagination strategies for GET collection endpoints.
Skip-based paging uses the query parameters page[size]
and page[number]
to specify the max number of resources returned and the page number. We default to skip-based paging if there are no page parameters. The response will include a links
object containing links to the first, last, prev, and next pages of data.
If the contents of the collection change while you are iterating through the collection, you will see duplicate or missing documents. For example, if you are iterating through the calender_event
resource via GET /pub/calendar_event?sort=start_at&page[size]=50&page[number]=1
, and a new calendar_event
is created that has a start_at
value before the first calendar_event
, when you fetch the next page at GET /pub/calendar_event?sort=start_at&page[size]=50&page[number]=2
, the first entry in the second response will be a duplicate of the last entry in the first response.
Cursor-based paging uses the query parameters page[limit]
and page[after]
to specify the max number of entries returned and identify where to begin the next page. Add page[limit]
to the parameters to use cursor-based paging. The response will include a links
object containing a link to the next page of data, if the next page exists.
Cursor-based paging is not subject to duplication if new resources are added to the collection. For example, if you are iterating through the calender_event
resource via GET /pub/calendar_event?sort=start_at&page[limit]=50
, and a new calendar_event
is created that has a start_at
value before the first calendar_event
, you will not see a duplicate entry when you fetch the next page at GET /pub/calendar_event?sort=start_at&page[limit]=50&page[after]=<cursor>
.
We encourage the use of cursor-based paging for performance reasons.
In either form of paging, you can determine whether any resources were missed by comparing the number of fetched resources against meta.count
. Set page[size]
or page[limit]
to 0 to get only the count.
It is not valid to mix the two strategies.
Use this page to mock Fitbit Plus API in your testing and development.
Run our mock API sample using the open source WireMock library, or in the free edition of WireMock Cloud. You'll have a working API server simulating the behavior of Fitbit Plus API, which will allow you to keep building and testing even if the actual API you isn't currently available.